Search the Moravia Blog

Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Follow Us

Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

U.S. presidents don't give a damn about foreign languages [Infographic]

  
  
  
Pin It

Language has always been important for U.S. presidents: the English language that is. Every syllable, every turn of phrase is analyzed. Remember the discussion over Bill Clinton's meaning of "is"? Or the more recent dust up over the antecedent of "that" when Barack Obama said: "You didn't build that"?

Despite this hyper-attention to speech, a U.S. presidential candidate's ability to speak a foreign language has been a nonstarter or even a liability in recent years. First, Democratic candidate John Kerry in 2004, then current Republican candidate Mitt Romney were blasted as elitist and even anti-American for speaking French.

But it wasn't always that way. Of the last 44 presidents, nearly half have spoken at least one foreign language, and many spoke several. Thomas Jefferson mastered five languages and was said to have been studying Arabic, Gaelic and Welsh as well. Ambidextrous James Garfield loved to show off the fact that he could write in Greek and Latin, at the same time.

moravia infographic presidents speech

It's probably not surprising that most of the multilingual U.S. presidents served before the modern era. In fact, after Franklin Roosevelt, no sitting president has been fluently bilingual, and only four had a limited conversational ability in a foreign language: Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush know some Spanish; Clinton speaks basic German; and Obama can say a few phrases in Indonesian.

The decline in U.S. presidents' foreign language ability coincides with the rise of English as the world's lingua franca. It is currently the official language of the United Nations and the European Union as well as many countries that have multiple native languages.

Of course, there’s also been a political shift in the U.S. regarding languages. In the past, the large majority of university students studied languages, especially Greek and Latin, so multilingualism was seen as a mark of education, not of political leanings.

Could you imagine the reaction today to a president who spoke Mandarin Chinese? Herbert Hoover did. And consider that both Republican darling Teddy Roosevelt and Democrat icon FDR spoke fluent French and German, the latter during WWII—and nobody questioned their patriotism because of it.

The political climate is different today. As CBS reported, a furor erupted a few years back when President Obama even suggested that American students should learn a foreign language. Just last week, a translation error in a publication by the conservative Government Accountability Institute raised additional anti-Obama furor in right-wing circles for even the suggestion of foreign influence on the presidential race.

Yet, we may see a change in attitudes toward bilingualism as the Hispanic population in the U.S. continues to grow. In the last few presidential campaigns already, we've seen candidates at least trying a few phrases in Spanish. Even Mitt Romney's son Craig has stumped for his father in Spanish to court the Hispanic American vote.

And while English is currently the world's lingua franca, it may not dominate forever. Even now, it is only the third most natively spoken language, behind Spanish and Mandarin Chinese. Who knows? Herbert Hoover may have been onto something.

Comments

The idea that "we're Americans, so we should only speak our language is a form of ignorance. The article noted that multilingualism used to be a sign of education. It should still be such: most of the educated people whom I know speak more than one language.
Posted @ Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:21 PM by Lee Eisenberg
Part of the problem is the American educational establishment that stopped requiring foreign languages in the first place. Some people in my family had to study three years of one to get their diploma, and now you don't need one at all in most places. 
 
The other dirty work of the educational establishment is that they've dumbed down foreign language instruction. At many schools, students are "taught" foreign languages without any intention of their actually learning to function in them. Languages are offered as "cultural enrichment" instead, so at many schools they learn "about" the languages, but they don't learn the languages. This is just as some schools have kids taking classes where they learn about math, but they don't learn math. 
 
I don't know how it is now, but some time ago I read studies that the Hispanic community is linguistically assimilating just as quickly as any other immigrant group. The impression that they aren't is allegedly due to the fact that more Hispanics arrive, so the number of Hispanics who don't speak English appears to remain stable. It's just different people not speaking English.
Posted @ Sunday, October 21, 2012 9:46 PM by James Kirchner
There are a handful of errors in the article. First, it's not true that English is "the language" of the United Nations. It's one of two "working" languages, including French, but there are six official languages, including Arabic, Chinese, Russian, and Spanish. 
 
http://www.un.org/en/aboutun/languages.shtml 
 
Also, "the European Commission employs English, French and German in general as procedural languages" 
 
http://ec.europa.eu/languages/languages-of-europe/eu-languages_en.htm 
Posted @ Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:37 PM by Steven Marzuola
Comments have been closed for this article.